1/400 Review of 2016: Panda Models

8/1/2017

Panda Models only started production in April 2015 but have grown tremendously and had a stonking 2016, producing a range of excellent Boeing and Airbus narrowbodies plus some kickass GSE. In fact in 2016 they have produced only slightly less models than Gemini Jets and begun to both expand their range and look outside of China for subject matter. Are they the best manufacturer in 2016? Let's see...

For my earlier posts about Panda models see the following from May 2016:

Panda Models Pt1: The Story So Far
Panda Models Pt2: The Models

Panda have come a long way since May and seem to be on an upward trajectory that could see them become a major global model manufacturer. If you've not heard of them by now you've really had your eyes closed, though unless you are interested in Chinese airliners I guess they are easy to ignore. They are rarely sold outside of China but do regularly come up from at least one eBay seller and have been seen for sale at Aviation Retail Direct (ARD) in the UK too. Producing only narrowbodies has been a limiting factor, but that has just changed with new A330s.

During 2016 Panda has released (or announced 82) models, which is only 15 or so short of Gemini Jets. Obviously the volumes produced are a lot lower (in the 90-150 range), however that enables a diverse range of airlines (albeit 99% Chinese) to be made. 30 of the models have been produced for Skywings.

It hasn't all been China though and Panda has begun to show signs of moving out into the rest of the world with a Lufthansa A320NEO and AirAsia 'Taylor Swift' A320. With a growing selection of excellent moulds it'd be a shame for them not to make more global airlines.

Additionally Panda beat both Aeroclassics and Phoenix to market with its very nice Cathay Dragon and China Eastern 'Shanghai Disney' A320s:

Moulds

Panda started the year with a limited stock of moulds but they were the best of their types available. The ex-Aeroclassics cloned A320 is still the best in 1/400, whilst the 737-700 and 800 in my opinion are better than anything used by Gemini / JC or Phoenix. Similarly the 737-300 is the same as the excellent mould used by Aeroclassics.

Below is a selection of A319s using the 'new' Panda mould:

These moulds were added to in May with the A319 (both standard and Sharklet equipped versions) and then in October with 1/400's first decent A320NEO. In fact the NEO is so good it'll be hard to ever beat. For a closer look at the China Southern A320NEO see my blog entry - A320NEO Delivery Review: Next Stop China

Below: The Panda Models A320NEO - unlike the Aeroclassics it has proper engines!

Military Heavylifters

Panda also has a decent military Y-20 Kunpeng to use and has released four examples to date in development and PLAAF colours. The wing seam aside it's a decent mould - though they do for some reason seem to cost a lot more than the Boeings and Airbuses:

GSE Fire Engines and Buses

Beijing Airport Fire Engines

Panda are also the only manufacturer producing Ground Service Equipment on a regular basis. In 2016 these have mainly been a new range of Fire Engines. So far there have been 5 sets released: a Yellow Boeing set and red airport specific sets for Beijing, Shanghai, Kunming and Hong Kong Airports. They are really nice units.

Panda already had a great range of buses - see my review of their buses - GSE Review: Modern Buses.
They have continued this with most recently a new set dedicated to AirAsia. The best thing about the GSE from Panda is that it is available at a perfectly decent price - unlike Gemini's bus releases.

2016 Complete Aircraft Releases

Here's a summary of Panda's releases for 2016. There has been a good range of airlines from the big three Chinese majors, the next tier of airlines (Shenzhen Airlines, Shandong Airlines, Xiamen Airlines etc), new startups (Fuzhou Airlines, Urumqi Air, GX Airlines etc) and older 1990s carriers (China Yunnan, China Xinhua and Wuhan Airlines). I'm really pleased with the selection of releases myself but then again I'm perhaps in the minority with my interest in China!

Into 2017

I'm excited to see what 2017 brings for Panda models. In 2016 I bought a whopping 43 of their models and y'know what not one came with tabs on the tyres, bent undercarriage, ill fitting wings, fingerprints on the fuselage etc etc. They did occassionally get the colours wrong but in general the models had excellent detailing and where well put together. For such a strong effort that makes them for me the manufacturer of 2017. I bought far fewer JC Wings and Phoenix and had a lot more issues.

Plus they seem to be going from strength to strength. If the recent HYJL Wings releases are to be trusted as a source of things to come for Panda we can expect aerials on the Airbuses and an A321 soon. Even better they have just announced A330s and even a mould for the A330-200F. The A330s have aerials and look spectacularly good.

If you haven't tried out Panda models yet I really recommend you give them a try. So far they have made excellent models, sold at decent prices, which are well finished and quick to the market. The only drawback are the small volumes and hassle in getting hold of them. The rest of the manufacturers need to step up their game to compete.

6 Comments

Andrew Klein

9/1/2017 06:16:23 pm

I've never read such an unbalanced review of anything before!!!

There is a reason that they only produce TINY numbers for within China; nobody wants to buy overpriced garbage. People also don't want to risk being on the receiving end of a hefty lawsuit for dealing in illegal "clones" as you put it of somebody else's intellectual property.
Panda Models is nothing more than a monkey-see/monkey-do operation, run by the most sleazy unethical douchebags in China.

Things that you give them credit for, as being the "only one" doing it, will not apply in 2017, or henceforth.
Let us hope that in 2017, your Panda Models go the way of the do-do bird, Tucano models, and other attempted ventures run by scumbags and thieves.

RStretton

9/1/2017 08:00:30 pm

Cheers Andrew as always your balanced replies are welcome! As I have stated before I can't comment on the ins and outs of their or your operations, I can only report on the models themselves. As I understand it isn't Panda run by the former owner of Aeroclassics?

I am happy to see more competition to Panda in 2017 - so are you suggesting that AC will create a NEO mould, put aerials on its models, release good 737NGs and get back into GSE in 2017?

Flagship

9/1/2017 08:25:54 pm

I'm a brazilian collector and I think Panda will be one of my next models when they come the make models to the whole world markets. The Airbus A320 NEO really looks amazing, instead of that piece of shit made by AeroClassics with Latam's livery.

Triggered Aircraft Builder

9/1/2017 11:30:58 pm

I think AK should be careful lecturing others about intellectual property.

Afterall, does he have the full rights to produce the EVA Hello Kitty A330s? Does he have the rights to produce models of Boeing's intellectual property?

If not, then he is also guilty of creating illegal clones.

BHL

9/1/2017 09:09:01 pm

For the last decade or two since the little molds with the screws in the center, I believe there has been only one very classic owner of Aeroclassics, who currently appears to be more than a tad annoyed at what Panda is doing.

Molds, factories, and factory managers have come and gone, sometimes with losses of parts or entire molds. Molds have been not infrequently been swapped for production by agreement of their owners. Curiously, partnerships in this small industry have been remarkably unsuccessful and often highly acrimonious. But... given the arrangement by which Panda had access to the original molds, I would be extremely surprised to find that they had developed entirely new molds all by themselves.

Did Panda enhance the molds with antennae? Yes indeed, and they did put NEO engines on the A320NEO. Do they look good? Very much so. But enhancements to unlicensed molds do not make them unaccountable to original ownership.

If AC chooses to put on antennae and good A320NEO engines in 2017, great! I look forward to seeing what the new year brings.

9/1/2017 09:41:47 pm

Agreed it seems to be a very murky business and without lots of detailed information I can only base my purchases on the models themselves. It looks like Panda have copied the Aeroclassics Airbuses but always owned the 737s (which were leased by AC). My opinion is that if Panda are doing something illegal then it is up to Aeroclassics and/or the Chinese authorities to deal with it. After all it's not like the manufacturers don't routinely flout the law when it comes to model licensing so none are whiter than white. If indeed Panda have stolen IP then I can understand AK's anger. However the background to this seems complicated and it is hardly unusual for AK to abuse his competitors. Just look at what he used to say about JC Wings. As a collector I cannot distinguish the truth of the situation so will base my purchases on the models themselves.

1/400 Review of 2016: Panda Models

Leave a Reply.

Author

Archives

Categories