Boeing 747SP Moulds in 1/400 Scale
|
Updated: June 2017
|
|
The 747SP was at the time the longest ranged airliner in the world designed to enable Pan Am and Iran Air to operate services from New York to the Middle East. As engines at the time simply didn't give the performance the easiest way to gain the range was to shorten the standard 747. Of course as engine improvements were created the ordinary 747-200B was able to match the SP's range and it is therefor eno surprise that production only reached 45 aircraft. The SP did however find a niche as the 'perfectly' sized private jet for Princes with too much money. The type's first flight was on July 4, 1975 and service entry with Pan Am was in 1976. Deliveries were over by the end of 1982 except for a single aircraft that was delivered as late as 1989. The type's commercial service ended in 2016, with Iran Air, but at the end of the year there were still 10 aircraft in service with government or private operators. One aircraft operates for NASA with a massive telescope fitted inside its rear fuselage.
Boeing 747SP in 1:400 Scale
Since only 45 747SPs were built it isn't surprising that there are not hundreds of different models floating about, however theer are still a decent number of them in 1/400 and it is pleasing to see Herpa fulfilling their chosen role in this scale i.e. to produce rare and unusual types in annoyingly small numbers. Unlike for the series 100 and 200 it is at least easy to explain the breakdown of models and moulds:
Boeing 747SP Variants
You'd have to be blind to not be able to tell a 747SP from a standard length 747 since the SP is much shorter and also has a noticeably taller vertical stabiliser. SPs were delivered with two engine options: either the Pratt & Whitney JT9D-7 or the Rolls Royce RB211-524.
A 747SP with JT9D engines
A 747SP with RB211 engines
Model Moulds
I'll look through the moulds in the usual date of release order:
Gemini Jets (2000-2017) - used 35 times (still in production)
As with their 747-100/200 mould Gemini are still using their old SP mould today and just like that mould it is in modified form. The Sp mould basically looks like they've literally chopped the old mould and put a new tail on it, therefore it shares the same features as the longer version mould. It captures the general shape of the 747 quite well but is very dated by modern standards. The undercarriage is very simple - not far away from just being stalks (a bit like early Dragon models). The nosegear doors are tiny especially on the United Saul Bass release which looks odd. The rear main gear legs move in their placements (a feature shared by many 747 moulds) and the wings completely lack the rearward pointing aerials that are such a feature of 747s at the wingtips, whilst the engine pylon / wing join is famously clumsy and ugly. As you'd expect from such an early mould it is a cradle fit but the seam line follows the wingtop line well so this is not a major issue. Lastly, as with many early Gemini moulds there is a secondseam line to enable fitment of the horizontal stabilisers. Since there isn't any other option for a lot of the SP models if you want them you're going to have to live with this mould. Incidentally the two Schuco releases are just rebadged versions of existing Gemini Jets releases.
As with their 747-100/200 mould Gemini are still using their old SP mould today and just like that mould it is in modified form. The Sp mould basically looks like they've literally chopped the old mould and put a new tail on it, therefore it shares the same features as the longer version mould. It captures the general shape of the 747 quite well but is very dated by modern standards. The undercarriage is very simple - not far away from just being stalks (a bit like early Dragon models). The nosegear doors are tiny especially on the United Saul Bass release which looks odd. The rear main gear legs move in their placements (a feature shared by many 747 moulds) and the wings completely lack the rearward pointing aerials that are such a feature of 747s at the wingtips, whilst the engine pylon / wing join is famously clumsy and ugly. As you'd expect from such an early mould it is a cradle fit but the seam line follows the wingtop line well so this is not a major issue. Lastly, as with many early Gemini moulds there is a secondseam line to enable fitment of the horizontal stabilisers. Since there isn't any other option for a lot of the SP models if you want them you're going to have to live with this mould. Incidentally the two Schuco releases are just rebadged versions of existing Gemini Jets releases.
In exactly the same way as with the 747-100/200 Gemini have gone to some trouble to fix the issues it originally had and make it more suitable for today's market. The changes have been gradual. They have got rid of the second seam at the rear and recast the wings with HF wingtip aerials, albeit slightly chunky ones. The undercarriage was improved quite early on and the latest releases have rolling gears too. Again as with the 100/200 what hasn't changed is the poor pylon join point, which remains the moulds achilles heal. The most recent 2 releases (Iraqi and Saudia) also have had aerials added to them. Gemini seem to slip out between 1 and 2 models every 2 years.
The mould is now part of the JC Wings back catalogue and Skywings have recently worked with JC Wings to get an Air China and a CAAC 747SP made. They have just been released although the CAAC version incorrectly is missing the anti-glare shield.
I should note that I have had issues with the HF aerials. They are thick enough on the models but both of mine have been broken so I'm blaming the box!
The mould is now part of the JC Wings back catalogue and Skywings have recently worked with JC Wings to get an Air China and a CAAC 747SP made. They have just been released although the CAAC version incorrectly is missing the anti-glare shield.
I should note that I have had issues with the HF aerials. They are thick enough on the models but both of mine have been broken so I'm blaming the box!
Herpa (2006-2011) - used 3 times
Herpa bug the hell out of me. Here they have produced a wonderful 747SP mould and then used it 3 times in 11 years! How do they make any money? Anyway the mould is great. It has slot in wings and so is seamless, nice detailed undercarriage and good engine pylons too. Plus the overall shape is very good. Only minor issue is the tail fit - a common problem for Herpa moulds. There is still plenty of scope for new 747SPs in 1/400 and if Herpa don't mind throwing money away maybe they can make some!! Infuriating.
Herpa bug the hell out of me. Here they have produced a wonderful 747SP mould and then used it 3 times in 11 years! How do they make any money? Anyway the mould is great. It has slot in wings and so is seamless, nice detailed undercarriage and good engine pylons too. Plus the overall shape is very good. Only minor issue is the tail fit - a common problem for Herpa moulds. There is still plenty of scope for new 747SPs in 1/400 and if Herpa don't mind throwing money away maybe they can make some!! Infuriating.
The Wish List
Despite the decent number of releases there is plenty of scope for new SPs. Some of this comes from needing replacements for the simple first run Geminis. Especially in need of a re-release are United 'Saul Bass', Braniff, American Airlines and SAA new colours. You can't tell me these wouldn't sell!
Aside from rereleases there is room for new SPs for interesting airlines. If any of the manufacturers knew how to market releases or could make them in numbers of under 200 I think these would sell:
Despite the decent number of releases there is plenty of scope for new SPs. Some of this comes from needing replacements for the simple first run Geminis. Especially in need of a re-release are United 'Saul Bass', Braniff, American Airlines and SAA new colours. You can't tell me these wouldn't sell!
Aside from rereleases there is room for new SPs for interesting airlines. If any of the manufacturers knew how to market releases or could make them in numbers of under 200 I think these would sell:
|
|
|
|
|
|
