The review of Gemini Jets 2015 releases can be found here.
I already covered Gemini Jets January-April 2016 releases in an earlier review which can be found here.
Thanks to Michael at Waffle Collectibles for use of his photos.
The findings of both my previous reviews still hold true so I won't repeat them again. Gemini have an impressive mould back catalogue to play with (though often the moulds are pretty ordinary) but use it mainly to focus on the obvious, avoiding heavy competition with their sister company, JC Wings, and Phoenix. There avoidance of classic releases mean there is rarely any overlap with Aeroclassics too, though there is some overlap on the modern Airbus front. Below are photos of 26 of Gemini's releases from 2016 - not the best and not the worst - just 26 of the fair to middling. One thing that seems to stand out is cockpit printing. The windows look too low on the China Southern EMB-190, KLM EMB-190 and Emirates A380s, too high on the EL AL and Norwegian 787-9s and just crap on the Delta 717 and Alaska 737s.
New A321 Mould?
There hasn't been a lot of movement on the mould front in 2016. This is a shame because a couple of Gemini's newer moulds (which are really JC Wings efforts) have quite large issues. I'm thinking the A330 (and its incredible wings) and the 737-800 (and its pointy nose and giant tyres). One area that has seemingly changed however is the A321. During 2015 Gemini didn't release any, after having used the Phoenix mould in 2014. In April 2016 they look like they slipped out a new mould with little fanfair. It does look quite similar to the earlier one but the nosegear, wings and aerials look quite different. Unfortunately I haven't seen it in person.
It looks quite similar to the new JC Wings A320, which was slipped out in December, but has yet to be used by Gemini. The A321 looks ok from the photos I have seen however the antenna are massive. More worrying is the apparent variability in the wing height. Just like with the A330 some releases have wings that are gull like and point upwards at a crazy angle. Can anyone confirm this issue in person - I have only seen photos.
Above on the Thomas Cook release the wings look good. Below on the Vietjet it looks like it's trying to be a Vought F4U Corsair! Or is it just the photo angle??? Either way compare it with the AA release above.
Goodbye to the A320?
The appearance of the new JC Wings A320 mould means it must be time to say goodbye to the older version. It had some issues (seams and undercarriage detailing) but it wasn't bad (when put together properly - which it often wasn't) and at least it looked like an A320. I can't say I'll miss it hugely but it was an ok mould that just couldn't compete against the Aeroclassics version. Here are some of this years A320s:
The newest version of the 747 has been something of a turkey saleswise but Gemini have access to an excellent mould for it and of all the manufacturers perhaps seem keenest to release cargo airlines. This has meant the 747-8 has got a decent run out and in some more unusual schemes. There has been Air Bridge Cargo in June, Silk Way in September and Saudia Cargo in November. Then again these releases have often had quite major colour issues. In addition the Qatari private jet 747-8i release seemed to get good reviews too.
Gemini is hardly known for releasing obscure airline models but has slipped out a couple of more interesting models since April. The Icelandair 'Hekla Aurora' was many people's model of the year despite the chunky undercarriage of the 757 mould. The Vietjet A321 suggests that Gemini will sometimes move away from legacy airlines, but it was September that perhaps saw the two most unusual releases - an Arkia 757-300 and Magnicharters 737-300. Sadly the nose of the Gemini/JC 737-300 is a complete disaster rendering what would have been a buyable release useless in my eyes. To be honest when I look over the releases list there really aren't anymore especially surprising releases. Are Interjet and MASWings unusual - probably if you're a Gemini buyer? Then again it seems the majority of the collectorate are happy with the standard Gemini fare.
The Russians are Coming
Possibly the most pleasing aspect for me has been Gemini's engagement, in a small way at least, with the modern Russian market. They released Aeroflot's budget airline Pobeda on a 737-800 in July and more unexpectedly the 737-500 got a rare run out in UTAir colours in November. I still struggle with the 737-800 mould (see below) but I suspect I will eventually pickup the UTAir to go with the JCWings 767-200. Hopefully Gemini will release more Russian narrowbodies in 2017.
That 737NG Mould
I keep seeing people praising the Gemini 737NG mould, even thinking it is one of the best. As I've said in this review I just don't see it. Compare below. Obvious issues are :
Now it's not a total write off and none of the 1/400 737NG moulds are perfect (see my mould review) but it's hardly one of the best moulds available let alone the best 737NG. It could certainly be massively improved with smaller aerials and new undercarriage at the very least.
My Purchases - or lack of
I am not a Gemini buyer anymore. In 2016 so far I have purchased 106 models and none have been Geminis! That says something about their releases. I almost got the Air China 787-9 but in the end settled for the Phoenix version. I may pick up 1 or 2 but that'll be it. Having said that this is hardly new so can't really be called a disappointment. For others (mainly American buyers) I know Gemini is producing just what you're after.
Quality - or lack of
Gemini's reliance on JC Wings for production purposes continues to be a hit and miss affair. The models simply aren't often well put together and especially given the high cost of the models this is hardly acceptable. As with JC Wings' models themselves Geminis often tend to fall apart out the box with not enough glue used to hold them together. Plus Gemini has fallen foul of quite a few colour cockups plus paint smears etc. These issues seem to have gotten far worse this year and there is no excuse for it. It has gotten to the point where they have the lowest QC of all the manufacturers, which for the flagship brand in 1/400 (at least in terms of marketing and fanboys) is outrageous.
Ideas - or lack of
The other big disappointment for me is the continued lack of classics, and when they are made they are often rubbish. Take the Pan Am DC-8 for example. What were they thinking? The mould is appallingly old fashioned and compared to Aeroclassics a real shocker for a 2016 release. Plus they've made a mess of the cockpit windows. The Convair 580 and MD-80 moulds also continue to get very poor usage. December's Continental MD-80 looks very good but 2 MD-80s a year is pitiful and you'd have thought that at the same time Gemini released the American AirCal retrojet 737-800 they could have also slipped out an AirCal MD-80 to capitalise on it. But no, Gemini seem a company largely devoid of a love for aviation and certainly an imagination.
And that brings me to the cost. Historically Gemini have been the cheapest of the manufacturers and certainly on the seconds market their models do not hold their value in the way Aeroclassics and Phoenix do. Yet a new pricing regime brought in by Gemini in 2016 has seen the price of the models skyrocket. This has especially impacted British buyers (thanks to the Brexit madness) but is also noticeable in USD pricing. Nearly $50 for an A380 is way above Phoenix prices (around $42) and miles above Aeroclassics. The models simply are not often special enough to warrant such hikes, which seem like a cynical cash-in on collectors.
The full release list
Below is the full list of Gemini 1/400 releases by month. After that we conclude with the best and worst Gemini Jets of the year according to me :)
Dross of the Year from Gemini
Gemini do make some crap, albeit nicely detailed, amongst a generally inoffensive bunch of models. There are just some bad moulds in the JC Wings catalogue that get used. The Magnicharters 737-300, Delta 717 and Southwest 73G are all just outside the bottom 5 but here are probably the 5 worst efforts.
Model of the Year from Gemini
I probably sound like I don't like Gemini models and that isn't the case. They make some good stuff too. My top 5 of the year goes to these lovely efforts but the A350s and 747-400s score highly as well:
Face it Gemini don't really care about collectors. They are going to keep trucking along charging high prices for mediocre offerings of obvious models. If you are into collecting modern US airlines tough luck - they have you over a barrel unless it's an Airbus. My opinion is that given the price hikes and the variable QC you are almost always better of getting an Aeroclassics or Phoenix if you can. Sadly a lot of the time you don't have the choice. I don't expect Gemini to change their business model at all next year and I can't see me picking up many of their models in 2017. There's plenty of other models out there to collect and Gemini aren't going to miss my business. They appear to be doing fine doing it their way and if you've been happy with them in 2016 you won't care anyway (and you probably need glasses).
4/1/2017 09:41:15 am
4/1/2017 10:36:27 am
Hi Julian - thanks for your comments. I understand about your issues regarding PHX and JC but at least those manufacturers take a wider geographic view. Check out my mould review for a detailed view of the A320 moulds. I like the JC A320 and own several but as decent as it is it isn't as good as the AC.
4/1/2017 05:15:29 pm
Very nicely done Rich. I really like the B747-8 slide show. This is many hours of research and work. I just want you to know it is appreciated and enjoyable. HNY 2017
5/1/2017 12:07:34 am
Thanks again Richard for a comprehensive and honest review. My main collecting criteria is to record airline histories and those seen in the UK, but with few retro models made by GJ and that horrendous price hike, I'm afraid I can't see me purchasing any new GJ models. As you say, the few times they do produce a retro model, they nearly always screw something up.
5/1/2017 01:34:09 pm
Great opinion piece there Rich, and i agree with you at every point. I only bought a few GJ's this year, the Hekla of course but spoiled by the old school over sized gears. I'm still waiting for the 'announced last April' Herpa 400 version, which if nothing else looks like a regular 757, not an 'off road monster truck' version.
8/1/2017 04:34:13 pm
Interesting article. Does anyone wonder why neither Phoenix or Gemini fail to stray into each others core territory? Gemini's total lack of quality control in 2016 is beyond belief. The colours of some models have been beyond a joke and I cannot understand why there is not more of backlash against it. Are the collectorate so unwilling to miss out they pay anything and accept anything regardless of its quality? Because that seems to be the upshot of all of this. Now and again, but as a good friend often repeats, 'seemingly by accident' Gemini and JCW produce a good model. When is that ever the basis to collect anything? The other day somebody posted the new Air France 789 on Facebook declaring Gemini's efforts 'a beauty'. It had black factory oily finger prints on the white (seen those very same marks often on models I've received), and from a mediocre photo I could see half a dozen other faults, four of them paint issues a blind monk could spot from Jupiter with a telescope. Does anyone really care any more, or is their a chronic brand blindness that, like a Trump tweet, is simply believed as gospel even when it's a lie? I understand that people do not like their chosen brand denigrated when they choose to spend money on it. People want to hear the good not the bad, but that should never, surely hide us from the realities no matter what they are?
21/3/2017 03:50:38 pm
I really love your reviews and summaries.
Leave a Reply.
I'm Richard Stretton: a fan of classic airliners and airlines who enjoys exploring their history through my collection of die-cast airliners. If you enjoy the site please donate whatever you can to help keep it running: