Special thanks to Minh Quan Nguyen for help with this wishlist.
The Tu-204 obviously bears a resemblance to the Boeing 757, with which it is roughly analogous. However, to my eye, it has quite a distinctive profile, which means it is hard to confuse with the US type/ It may not have had the range of the 757 but in other respects seems to have been reasonably competitive, although no doubt it was constrained by its Russian engines (a small number were fitted with Rolls-Royce engines). Certainly, compared with over Soviet designs of a similar vintage, like the IL-96, the Tu-204 looks like it was a better bet.
âI think there can be little doubt that if the Soviet Union had of continued it would have been produced in large numbers and seen service with Aeroflot and other Warsaw Pact state airlines. As it was it was thrust into a decentralized Russian airline environment the type was acquired in small numbers by a variety of new Russian airlines but its sales prospects were hamstrung by the collapse of the Russian economy and subsequent availability of Western aircraft with guaranteed support mechanisms.
âThere have been multiple variants of the basic TU-204, although many of them have not seen production. The original TU-204-100 and 200 baseline designs are broadly similar to the TU-214. The main difference between the variants is bizarrely that they are made in different factories both of which are independent of Tupolev. The TU-204-300 (or TU-234) is a shortened longer-range variant.
Existing Models
Interestingly there have already been TU-204s made in less popular scales. I own quite a few 1:600 scale Schabak TU-204s and more recently Herpa has produced 6 standard length TU-204s and a single TU-204-300 in 1:500.
Possibilities in 1:400
âThe production of fresh Soviet-era moulds in 1:400 scale has been widely panned by many who have questioned their sales prospects. In a traditional US oriented market I think this is fair however in a more diverse China and Europe facing sales market I think there is plenty of scope for a TU-204, especially if production runs can viably be kept at a few hundred a piece.
âNG Models, HYJLwings and Panda have shown that this is achievable and the production of low use moulds like the ARJ21, C919 and Beluga XL suggest strongly that a TU-204 could be viable. Plus, it has the all-important Chinese operator heritage, albeit only a single aircraft.
Here's a look at what could be made. I'll just stick to the standard length Tu-204-100/Tu-214 in this post and there'll be a separate wishlist for the short Tu-204-30/Tu-234 coming soon.
If Aeroflot ever operated the TU-204 it was for only a short period in the early 90s but several aircraft appeared in SU colours and Aeroflot always sells well it seems so I think all three of these are very viable.
Above: Prototype at Paris in 1991. âDoD photo by JO1 PETE HATZAKOS [Public domain]
Tupolev
Fitted with Rolls-Royce engines at Farnborough 1992:
and MAKS 97:
Below is the stillborn Tu-204SM version from 2011:
I'm not sure if Aviastar Cargo still use the TU-204 but they had a few for a while, which wore a wide array of scheme versions. DHL is the most obvious seller.
Chinese orders in the end amounted to only a single aircraft delivered but basically if it's Chinese I think the large home market make it a good seller.
Considering North Korea's strong relationship with China i'd be amazed if we didn't see the Koryo liveries even though they only operated a single full length Tu-204 - P-633. There are three variants:
Cubana releases seem generally popular and they appear to still operate at least one TU-204. Another obvious high viability candidate?
Mahan Air
The Iranian carrier leased a pair of Cairo Aviation Tu-204s in 2005/06.
Although it has stepped back from its orders for new TU-204s Red Wings still is the largest civil operator of the type. A contemporary release with a lovely scheme as well. Sounds like it would sell ok to me.
Now that's a livery!
The government operator not the airline portion of Rossiya. I've never liked the grey scheme much but it has been made lots of times in 1:400 on other types.
Below RA-64515 converted as an airborne communication platform with dorsal addition:
The Russian Air Force use a special variant, the TU-214ON, for Open Skies flights. Nice scheme and quite exotic. Probably sell a couple of hundred?
RusJet are a business aviation operator but people love the Aeroflot scheme so maybe this is a go-er?
RusAir
Another private operator in the bespoke charter and bizjet line:
Older Russian Operators
There are a collection of older Russian airlines that used the TU-204. These are mostly larger well known Russian airlines (if you know anything about Russian airlines) and many have seen 1:400 releases on other types.
For me these are the most interesting possible models and the ones I'd be most interested in.
â
Not the loveliest scheme but it has been made in 1:400 by Aeroclassics on TU-154s and they were an important airline to the Russian Far East.
For a while in the early 2000s Kras Air was one of Russia's largest airlines and I think there is scope for more releases than the current IL-96.
A major airline in the Moscow market and Russia - great livery too! Also the launch customer.
Another less well known but still quite major operator at the time. Great livery too and it has been made in 1:500 already.
Actually quite a decent sized airline in the 90s but not a great scheme and probably too obscure for most. They had a much better livery later on.
Transeuropean
Short-lived Russian charter airline Transeuropean operated at least 1 Tu-204, RA-64018, at the end of the 90s.
A more recent operator. Aeroflot's old charter arm is nonetheless a bit obscure.
I'll finish up with one of the few non-Russian operators. That might make it more plausible but frankly it is barely a livery at all.
Then again they did operate SU-EAJ in the colours of TNT for a while, which is a lot more saleable.
6 Comments
I write in this space because cannot put comments in the corresponding update: https://www.yesterdaysairlines.com/tupolev-tu-204tu-214tu-234.html
Reply
Richard Stretton
2/4/2021 05:55:18 am
Everyone's welcome to their opinion but I disagree. I mentioned the nosegear doors but I don't see any major issues with the nosegear leg (the fit on the series 300 is better than the 200) or the pylons. I think your expectation with a 400 scale mould is possibly a bit far from reality but it is your opinion and you're welcome to it. I provided the images and you can make your own opinion and not buy it if you don't like them.
Reply
Pablo
4/4/2021 11:59:33 am
Dear,
Richard Stretton
4/4/2021 07:25:50 pm
You haven't put forward any constructive criticism of the mould at all - you haven't even said what your problem is with the gear or engine pylons. You've just said because you worked on the type it makes you an expert, which is bollocks. You appear to have an issue with me rather than this review. I don't have anymore time for you. This is my site so obviously what is written is my opinion, however I try and back it up with evidence as best I can. If you don't like what I'm writing then I suggest you don't read it. Nobody else has had any issues with these areas you appear to have major problems with. Why don't you make your case elsewhere and see if anyone agrees with you?
Garry
5/4/2021 07:28:08 pm
This is the Russian B757 aircraft! Probably from stolen plans they created this plane from??
Reply
Benjamin Etgen
9/4/2021 05:46:43 am
As an American collector I am thrilled by this release. The Tu-204 is a fascinating example of what a B757 could have been. I had assumed that like the Yak-42 the wing was going to prove to be too adventurous, and would need to be redesigned. Without both versions, I would probably have been content with the 1:500 Herpa models... However, if NG is making both then I'll need to have them alongside my B757-200 and -300.
Reply
Leave a Reply. |
Author
I'm Richard Stretton, an aviation enthusiast and major collector of 400 scale model aircraft. This blog discusses ongoing events in the world of 400 scale. This site is free. Please donate to keep it going.
|